Home | Who I am | Ed Ayres Publications | The Longest Race: A Lifelong Runner, an Iconic Ultramarathon, and the Case for Human Endurance | Racing to the End of the World | Surviving the Collapse | Resources | Contact
Will Humans Endure

evolutionfinal2.jpg

Will Humans Endure?


Why Civilization Will Probably End

Before the End of the 21st Century 

 
The biggest story in human history is that civilization as we know it is probably on its last legs.  Yet, no politician, public official, or media executive who wants to keep his job will acknowledge it—if in fact they haven’t already blocked out the possibility by means of a rigid cognitive denial.

            Scientists who track the planet’s destabilizing climate and failing ecosystems are very reluctant to acknowledge it publicly, because nearly all scientists depend for their employment on corporations or universities that are heavily invested in (or dependent on) the fossil-fuel, factory-farming, and other destructive industries.  Many of the leading scientists will say privately, however, that the outlook is now extremely grim.  I have heard what they sometimes admit when the microphone is not on.

            Good scientists also know that it is methodologically impossible for them to make outright prophesies; they can only speak in terms of probabilities.  Prophesies are the privilege of religion.  Probabilities are matters of hard data.

            In my life as a science editor, I have been in the perhaps unique position of having worked closely with some of the world’s top researchers in the fields of physics, biology, ecology, and human population.  And if I look at the separate probabilities of global collapse brought by nuclear holocaust, plague, ecosystem collapse, Malthusian population implosion, or a climate turned to Hell, all are now very high.  The probability that at least one of them will occur is so overwhelming that the best we can say is “approaching 100-percent.”

            Most people will deny this, if only because to accept it is very painful.  It’s not just politicians fearing they won’t be elected or re-elected, but everyone who wants to believe that somehow, something—technology, or human ingenuity, or Jesus—will save us.  This blog is for the relatively few who can recognize as truth what our entertainment media have treated as fiction—in blockbuster movies or TV shows about dystopian futures.  In the real world, as opposed to our many virtual ones, we are rapidly approaching the end of civilization.  But in the real version it won’t likely be a single event; it will be a cancer-like decline that is already sneaking up on us—and, as I will disclose, is already beginning to take us down.

            On our present course, the very likely Malthusian outcome will reduce the current global population—now approaching 8 billion—to perhaps a few hundred million within this century.  It’s also likely that from among those survivors an even smaller number will have acquired the skills and vision needed to continue the human journey, albeit toward a very different kind of world than we know now. 

 

 

 

 How Can I Know This? 

 

            My seven decades of life on Earth so far just happen to have been the most violent seven decades in human history.  I was born two months before Japanese warplanes bombed Pearl Harbor to precipitate America's entry into World War II, and I was four when we began a new era of destructive power by wiping out the city of Hiroshima with the first atomic bomb used against humans--about 100,000 people obliterated in a flash.  

                   But my first real inkling that I was living in a time of destruction unlike any before it came in the 1970s, when I went to work for a nuclear physicist named Ted Taylor, editing a journal he was writing to warn the world of what he knew about the risks of nuclear blackmail, terrorism, and holocaust--and the proliferating incidents of thefts and leaks of nuclear materials.  Taylor, as it happened, had been the leading designer (at Los Alamos) of the largest fission atomic bomb ever exploded on Earth, 37 times the power of the Hiroshima bomb.  It had been successfully tested in a detonation over a remote Pacific atoll, Enewetak, in 1952, and a duplicate had been built, ready to be dropped on Moscow, if the moment should come.

                   By the time I went to work for Taylor, we knew that moment very nearly had come--in the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962, when the U.S. and Soviet Union came within a hair-trigger's hair of a global holocaust. If Moscow had been blasted to kingdom come, New York and a score of other U.S. cities would quickly have followed--and within hours, across a world divided by superpower alliances, a hundred or more cities from London to Beijing.  Radiation storms would have taken u all.

                   Today, according  to the "Doomsday Clock" of the Union of Concerned Scientists" (the international association of nuclear scientists), the world is actually at  greater risk of nuclear apocalypse than it was when Ted Taylor was distributing his journal to the U.S. and international nuclear agencies.  And yet, nuclear holocaust is now only one of at least five major scenarios of civilizational destruction for which the probabilities are  now dangerously high.  I will describe those five--and a more recent sixth that appears now to be the greatest risk of all--in a forthcoming post.

                    But  for now, I want to first revisit an event that helped me fully grasp the enormity of the condition our global civilization is in.  It's an enormity defined not just by the scientific assessments of dangers unprecedented in human evolution, but by the willful denial of those assessments by public officials, politicians, and media.

                    The event that brought this pervasive denial--and the reality it hid--into full consciousness for me occurred in 1992.  At the time, I was editorial director at the Worldwatch Institute, a nonprofit organization that tracks global environmental and social trends., So I was already aware that we were in a time of staggering change.  But even so, I didn't hear about this event until after the fact because it was blacked out by mainstream media--and a direct  notice of it didn't reach my desk until it came in the mail several days later.  Here's an account of it excerpted from my forthcoming book, Racing to the End of the World (see link at the top of this page).

 

                    In 1992, large group of the world's leading scientists sent out a press release headlined "A Threat to Human Survival."  The preamble stated:

 

                                                We the undersigned senior members of the world's scientific community

                                                hereby warn all humanity of what lies ahead.  A great change in the stewardship

                                                of the earth and life on it is required if vast human misery is to be avoided

                                                and our global home on this planet is not to be irretrievably mutilated . . . .

                                                Humans and the natural world are on a collision course.  [Italics added]

 

              To pressured news editors, the report might have looked, at a quick glance, like a handout version of one of those "The End is Near" prophesies we'd see on hand-lettered posters held by bearded old men on busy street corners.  But this statement was different: It was a tersely worded document signed by 1,575 of the world's top biologists, chemists, physicists, ecologists, and earth scientists, including 101 Nobel Prize winners.  Among its signers were the renowned astrophysicists Carl Sagan and Stephen Hawking, evolutionary biologists Stephen Jay Gould, Edward O. Wilson, and Lynn Margulis, population biologist Paul Ehrlich, anthropologist Sarah Hrdy, Economist Wassily Leontief, chemist Linus Pauling, DNA pioneer James Watson (co-discoverer of the double-helix structure), and astronomer James Van Allen (for whom the Van Allen Belt around the earth is named.)

                       The day after the release was distributed to the media, it seems not to have been reported in a single U.S. newspaper--at least not that I could find any record of.  A front-page story in the New York Times that day recounted the struggle of a Muslim family to survive in war-torn Sarajevo.  But the struggle of all humanity, present and future, to survive on an ecologically torn planet?  Nothing.  Later, when asked, the Times editors said they had not considered the story "newsworthy."  The same mind-boggling excuse was offered by the Washington Post.

                         

                        In the nearly quarter-century since that warning, the truth of it has been hugely amplified--as coming posts on this blog will make clear. 

 

 

Next: The Five Major Dystopian Scenarios--and a Recent Sixth

 


   

 

             



mcwords2.jpg
Any ONE of these can . . . . Yet, ALL of them, now . . . .

 

copyright 2014 - All rights reserved